remove 'no shared bliss'

[Soxson]

Now that you can bliss anonymously, there's really no need to hide bliss. It just prevents people from getting gold. And we can all see the roll number which alerts us to the fact that someone blissed, which is exactly what anonymous bliss does anyway.

[Iesus]

I agree with Socks. Only affects new players in a positive way.

[flipynifty]

already posted about this, but feel free to continue making your own threads and feeling important

[Soxson]

No shared bliss seems to be default option when you make an account or reroll. Reroll reset all my options and when I blissed, it was hidden.

[flipynifty]

this idea is not stupid because I already suggested it and it seems people don't check forums before they post

[Blaze]

Cuz people are supposed to remember every thread ever :{ searched for the hell of it. Under the thread named a couple changes. How many dozens of threads have bland names like that that give no indication what they may be about? Not gonna waste an hour going through 30 threads to make sure it wasn't suggested under one of them :{

Wonder how many suggestions in atropos' monster of a suggestion board have been resuggested repeatedly by others <.< He's at like 4 pages now?


Sure it was only 2 weeks before this one was made but that's still time for a thread to get buried a page or two in this section. Just look. You bumped 5 threads in 6 minutes this morning. Easy to bury unpopular threads :{

Didn't you mention on Joanna's golden star or w/e thread 'the reward for your idea getting implemented is it being implemented'. Does it really matter if he spends 15 minutes searching on the off chance someone like Sox even remembers it exists to bump it.. or spends 30 seconds to slap out a new one? As long as it gets implemented that's the important part.

[flipynifty]

u win the spazz award