Min and Max damage...

Well... I see that in the description of some classes like Archer vs Ranger, which do +15% max range dmg, and +24% min damage respectively. But most of the weapon's min damage is sooo low that even +24% won't do much... eg. Putrifite Recurve Bow, 13-111 damage, in a ranger's hand it's only like 16-111, while in an archer's hand it can be like 13-137 damage... Then what's the point of those class that +% to min damage?

Or do I miss something? would someone enlighten me? Thanks

[Tridius]

rangers get a bonus to magic skills (green 3-9%)

[Morrodin]

Well, the bonus doesnt help much, but alittle is better then nothing. I prefer to go with more minimum damage because you dont always get 100% max damage. So i would try to do the most i could and keep my minimum damage high.

[Kerrlahg]

Max damage is the most beneficial, unless your goal is to build a character which only hits for minimum damage. As long as you don't severely screw something up with your build, you won't be hitting anywhere near your min damage.

[Morrodin]

True, you generally dont hit for minimum damage, but when you do, i like my minimum damage to be higher.

[agrimensorguapo]

If the minimum damage bonus applies to melee weapons, too, it would be beneficial for an archer/ranger that also has a piercer equipped.